Relative Clauses

There’s an activity in New Headway Advanced (2003, p.106) comparing two sentences which “mean the same”:

1. There are white coral sands fringed by coconut palms.
2. There are white coral sands which are fringed by coconut palms.

I wonder, though, whether they do, in fact, “mean” the same thing. Perhaps ‘construe’ is a better term. While it might be true that the first sentence is a “reduced past participle”, I’m interested more in why we would make a choice between these two sentences. I think the first one might be used if we want to construe both the island and the palm trees as representing one event together – ‘There are [white coral sands fringed by palm trees]’ – whereas the second sentence, for me, construes them as two separate parts – ‘There are [[white coral sands] which are [fringed by palm trees]]’. Here’s a picture:

Advertisements

About eflfunc

I'm an EFL teacher in Japan and this is a blog to record some thoughts on using Systemic Functional Linguistics in the foreign language classroom.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s